Justice As Desert: Is There Any Such Thing? :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Justice As Desert Is There Any Such Thing?ABSTRACT Philosopher Matthew Lipman, in Social Inquiry, orders that in that location are instances in which what unitary deserves may be undertake fairly readily. A sick child deserves medicine, a hungry child deserves food, children deserve an education... This seems to imply that these are cases in which what genius deserves is clear-cut, and only when the cases become more(prenominal) complicated does it become progressively more difficult to determine desert. I would submit that these cases are not most so cut-and-dry, in terms of find out desert, as one might imagine. Is it really correct to say that a sick child deserves medicine? Who is to say? Who is to be the ultimate arbiter? Is there some sort of authority or power (higher or otherwise) who is looked to in order to make such a determination (or who is looked to in order to discharge making such an assertion in the first place)? Is desert to be determined based on need? On abundance of what is deserved? On legal entitlements? This paper will address just such questions. Philosopher Matthew Lipman, in Social Inquiry, says that there are instances in which what one deserves may be specified fairly readily. A sick child deserves medicine, a hungry child deserves food, children deserve an education.... (1) This seems to imply that these are cases in which what one deserves is clear-cut, and only when the cases become more complicated does it become progressively more difficult to determine desert. (2) I would reply not so fast. These aforementioned cases, I submit, are not nearly so cut-and-dried, in terms of determining desert, as one might imagine. Is it really correct to say that a sick child deserves medicine? Who is to say? Who is to be the ultimate arbiter? Is there some sort of authority or power (higher or otherwise) who is looked to in order to make such a determination (or who is looked to in order to justify making such an assertion in the firs t place)? Certainly, a sick child usually needs indisputable medication in order to get better. Moreover, in a society in which such medication is plentiful, legislators may be prompted to enact a police force that stipulates that all sick children are entitled legally to such medication.But do they deserve such medication, just because they need it or the medication is bulky or they are legally entitled to it?