The Mexican Peso Crisis of December 1994

There ar three different types of immaterial stand in regimens that can be used by developing countries champion time their currency has stabilized. The first one is called the managed float. Also called the dirty float, the managed float is a system when exchange ranges are able to change collectable to the nature of the market, but leaves the option for the government to intervene if the fluctuation is not desired. It is the regime that has been used by the monetary system since 1973. The second regime is called the crawling rophy.The crawling band, in this case, would combine Mexicos crawling finalise with a wider band. The crawling band is a compromise between a system of entirely fluctuating exchange rates and those that are in conciliatory. The parity bit levels would be ad sightlyed either up or down as a moving average of the actual exchange rates that would oscillate on a wider band. The exchange rate would be only allowed to croak a maximum percentage. The amou nt of the percentage is called the annual crawling peg.The wider band that would cover the crawling peg would allow for the actual exchange rate to fluctuate. The third regime is called the floating exchange rate system. Also called the flexible exchange rate system, the exchange rate fluctuates based solely on market forces in this regime. A floating system allows countries to form self-sufficient monetary and fiscal policies. Also, central banks would not have to hold onto a large international reserve to back a fixed exchange rate system.Capital flight was one of the main reasons for Mexicos financial collapse of the peso. Capital flight is when assets and currency flow out of a country due to an economic all the samet that doesnt assure investors things are okay. Capital flight differs from majuscule flow because capital flight occurs when investors tone of voice that prices are about to fall and it becomes a race to get your money out before the prices fall. The assassin ation of presidential candidate Luis Colosio definitely compete a factor in the capital flight out of Mexico.In 1994, the United States, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and a few others created a rescue package for Mexico. The United States put up $20 zillion of the $50 billion for Mexico. The IMF guaranteed a credit agreement with Mexico for about $17. 7 billion. The Bank of International Settlements offered $10 to Mexico and The Bank of Canada offered about $1 billion. It was not just Mexico mismanagement that caused this crisis. The assassination of the presidential candidate was something that could not have been avoided and it caused to crisis to worsen even more.It seems like that event was the last straw on the camels back, so to say. In order to prevent this crisis from fortuity in the future, Mexico should pay closer attention to its current account balance. at once that this has happened once, Mexico should know what to look for in order to stop it before it gets even worse. Overall, the aid package was risky on the United States to do. No one was certain that Mexico would be able to pay back the money. The United States could just not do anything though.We have close ties with Mexico through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). We werent just going to permit Mexico fail. Just like the IMF helped Mexico back in 1994, they are currently modify to countries in need today. Countries with emerging markets such as Belarus, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Sri Lanka, and Ukraine are receiving capital from the IMF. Almost always, low-income countries are also receiving money from the IMF.