'Group dynamics in The Breakfast Club Essay\r'

'Whether classifys are make for sociable or task oriented purposes, the ability to conjure up and maintain a sense of affiliation, peer wear and collaboration is important for overall convocation functioning. The ropiness of a kind convention is bring upd by means of the brass section of a set of multitude averages, which are by and by defined as a guide for digest accept at bottom a throng of item-by-items. However, in order for a crowd to perform and produce results, the aggroup leader should guide his/her team through the proper dots of group bringment, which includes the following steps: forming, storming, averageing, execute and adjourning. Although teams should follow all these pointednesss of group development, the forming and the norming acts are the near important, since these develop and foster the development of the group norm which prevents segregation within a group. In addition, an commanding leadership style, which is a very positive syst em is useful in cohering a poorly unionised group, especially a group of young senior high school students as in the movie, The eat Club.\r\nThe first base breaker point of group development is the forming stage. Forming is when members get to sack out all(prenominal) former(a) and baffle common ground, speckle the group leader provides structure, direction and ground rules. For example, in the movie, The Breakfast Club, the forming stage was the point at which students were obligate into a group during detention, which provided structure and rules and allowed individuals to become old(prenominal) with unmatched another. The second stage in group development is the storming shape, which usually involves arguments, power struggles, debates and general deviation of interestingness, often resulting in individuals perceiving such gathering as a waste of time. An example of this stage too seen in the The Breakfast Club is where differing opinions and ideas due to variatio ns in social norms created conflict and arguments within the group.\r\nHowever, if a team leader is able to get past this stage by reminding members of the general goal, group members willinging undertake to work as a team and will spark onto the norming stage. At this stage, the group suffers to realize the more(prenominal) positive points of individuals within the group, which promotes the development of trust and enjoy which begins to build group viscidity. The next stage is the acting stage, which is typical of high-performing teams that are able to function as a group and figure out dissimilar options to get the job done smoothly and in effect without supervision. The final stage is the adjourning phase, which is the final step in completing tasks and breaking up the team. The groups that are formed as adolescents often determine group associations as self-aggrandizings and define an individual within their social group that will either set them with or against other groups. This is described in an article on social groupings by Colin Allen, which mentions that our social associations as adolescents are pissed indicators to future patterns of social norms as adults.\r\nTherefore, the group of students in the movie, The Breakfast Club, pot to a fault be extrapolated to adult group dynamics. However, the varying social norms between groups john present conflicts when adults are required to function within a very diverse group of individuals. In The Breakfast Club, the Jock, Geek, Prom Queen, Delinquent, and the Freak groups are brought unneurotic initially through an dogmatic or guiding leadership role, used to bring the group together in order to proceed to the next phase of group development. This stage is particularly important within a group of varying personalities, such as a group of high school students, since it is close often the only way such a diverse group can become long-familiar with each other. Then through the forming stag e, the group members move away from differing group norms, interact and eventually find common ground within the group and urinate a unified group norm.\r\nThe importance of growth a group norm is also illustrated in an experimental study done on group norms and self-aggressive behaviors, which indicated that the establishment of a group norm compete a crucial role in the building of self-inflicted aggression. This tendency to conform to a group norm was shown to influence individual behavior, such as the sweetening of self-image associated with group identification. Therefore, the formation stage in a group process is important, since it develops group norms by requiring the individual to gather data and impressions on similarities and differences within the group and rely on a strong authoritative leader for guidance. The second important stage in group development is the norming stage, which emphasizes interpersonal relations and group cohesion. This is the stage at which th e members are actively acknowledging each other through learning about one another and developing group cohesion.\r\nThrough this stage, individuals begin to share leadership roles and dissolve former cliques and bestow to the overall success of group functioning. This will also increase the sense of group belonging, and individual invested interest in solving any issues within the group. This stage is characterized by sharing, soliciting information, accepting and finally, providing feedback, and increased creativity. In the film, The Breakfast Club, this stage occurs later when the group has already bypast through the forming stage, where the individuals are able to function as a group towards the same goals. In general, if this stage is achieved, members of the group will become more give with each other and information sharing will occur, which will benefit the effectiveness of the group. At this stage a more relaxed leadership style can also be utilise, such as the classle ss or laissaize-fair methods.\r\nIn conclusion, the development of a group who vary in social norms is very dependent on the forming and norming stages, since these steps allow the group to develop a unified group norm. Depending on the characteristics of the group, commonly an authoritative style should initially be implemented in order to bring some cohesion to the group. As an example, a group of first division nursing students would benefit from the forming stage, under the direction of an autocratic leadership, since this would offer a solid foundation on which to build a unified group norm. after the group is formed and rules have been learned and accepted by the students, a less authoritative leadership style can be implemented in the norming stage. This will allow students the freedom to learn and look for the field of nursing and develop their individual federal agency within the field.\r\n'